data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ea56/9ea56de8e7756caa6c379a86b3ab6f3c25cc4eb7" alt="Gifted and talented program"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb616/fb616690a8a5a89f9a2d3549b8f28fda41bc47c7" alt="gifted and talented program gifted and talented program"
It would be easy to suggest that de Blasio-in Irving Kristol’s memorable language-is just another liberal mugged by reality. As for the mayor: He was conspicuously noncommittal in response to the panel of his administration’s own creation. The recommendations were met by swift opposition from several city leaders, who defended programs for precocious children while acknowledging the imbalance in program enrollment. The panel would instead prioritize schoolwide enrichment programs so a diverse student body could learn together under one roof. The panel argues in its report that the system serves to segregate by race, income, and language, and to “perpetuate stereotypes about student potential and achievement.” The panel would institute a moratorium on new gifted-and-talented programs, phase out existing programs, end the use of middle-school entrance criteria (such as grades, test scores, behavior, and lateness), and fundamentally alter high-school admissions practices. Hizzoner is known for his charged progressive rhetoric about ending inequality, but the proposal would compel him to stop talking and take on the thousands of families who like special academic offerings for their high-performing children. Over the summer, an education panel convened by Bill de Blasio put New York City’s mayor in a bind: It recommended dismantling much of the city’s programming for gifted students in order to advance integration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ea56/9ea56de8e7756caa6c379a86b3ab6f3c25cc4eb7" alt="Gifted and talented program"